Courtroom Tension in Lawsuit Against Big Sky Resort
A federal courtroom in Butte witnessed heated exchanges during a hearing involving a lawsuit against Big Sky Resort. The plaintiff, an attorney and former congressional candidate, claims serious injuries were sustained while skiing due to inadequate safety markings under the Challenger Lift.
The suit alleges ski patrol failed to warn of hazardous terrain, leading to significant injuries. In response, the resort argues that the area in question is not typically marked and that legal protections shield winter sports operators from liability.
Claims and Counterclaims
The plaintiff states that any settlement would support health benefits for seasonal resort staff. The resort counters that the case represents an abuse of legal process aimed at forcing changes in employment practices. Accusations include attempts to publicly pressure the resort through social media and billboard threats.
During proceedings, the judge questioned whether motives such as improving worker conditions should invalidate the legal complaint. However, the court also noted that unaddressed allegations in the counterclaim may be treated as admissions.
Courtroom Disruptions
At one point, the plaintiff raised his voice and used profane language, prompting the judge to call for order and remind all parties of courtroom decorum. Further concerns were raised over missed procedural deadlines and failure to respond to key allegations.
Ongoing Legal Battle
Debate over discovery requests and case relevance continued, with the resort describing some of the plaintiff’s demands as unrelated. The judge confirmed that injury claims do not excuse compliance with court procedures and offered the option of legal counsel.
The hearing concluded with a statement that the matter remains under advisement. No ruling had been issued as of the latest update.